
It’s
usually known that boys are stronger and have a higher self-esteem than girls.
As Martin and Gentry have mentioned in their “Stuck in the Model Trap” passage,
during adolescence, girls’ self-esteem goes down, whereas that of the boys goes
up, because all girls think of are ways to improve their look and be as
skinnier as possible, whereas boys don’t have that issue. Here, in this movie,
the situation is totally the opposite than that of what usually is the
case. Why is it so? Most probably,
because Estella, was already beautiful and had nothing to worry about and she
was grown up in an environment where she was forced to be strong and have a
higher self-esteem than boys, taking into consideration the situation Miss
Havisham has been in years ago. If Estella has a high self-esteem, than why
does Pip suffer from low self-esteem? Taking into consideration that Pip comes from
a poor family, he had no idea about the world that existed outside his house
and the lands surrounding it. Thus, when he found himself in a huge mansion,
with high class citizens, he felt unworthy. Therefore, Martin and Gentry’s
point of view is not necessarily true and somehow stereotypic, because as we
can see, the environment a person has lived and grown up in determines the
personality of a person.
What
came to my mind other than Martin and Gentry’s idea is that of Deborah Tannen.
In her book; “The Power of Talk” she talks about how women exercise authority
indirectly, and that girls are the ones who build reports/relations. In the above mentioned scene, we realize that
Miss Havisham, along with Estella (by influencing on her), somehow try to be in
control over Pip. Tannen’s point of view is totally correct, however, such acts
are usually implicit, because if you don’t know the past of the people involved
in the act, you won’t know what’s on their mind and what they may be capable
of.
According
to Austin, there are two types of acts; performances and performatives. In this
scene, we don’t see much performance; however the presence of a performative is
crystal clear. Austin thinks that designated people (in this case Miss
Havisham) achieve performatives, because they are linked to the situation. In
the mentioned scene, Miss Havisham was the perfect candidate to effect Estella
with her words (performatives), due to the fact that she was in a been there
felt that situation. She had experienced love and loss, and she knew exactly
what to say and how to act in order to somehow brainwash Estella and get
revenge through her. The word
“Performatives” here stands for words that do things. Sometimes words have more
effect on our daily lives than we can ever imagine. For instance, in Great
Expectations, “Well, you can break his heart.” Says it all and puts everything
on the table.
After
getting deep in the scene, reading between the lines and connecting the
conversation with three of the thinkers, I understood much more than I
originally knew when I first started writing this essay. I came to the
conclusion that oral communication, body language and settings, if not
connected, can’t communicate implicit meanings. Plus, I realized that implicit
meaning have much more effect, and are more important than explicit ones,
because that’s where the true story and the true events occur. Thus, by
combining these three thinkers, we get the ultimate effect the writer/director
is seeking to transfer to the viewers.
References
·
Austin. Lecture
II.
·
Tannen, D. (1995). The
power of talk.
·
Martin & Gentry. Stuck
in the model trap.
Dickens, C. (Writer) (2013). Great expectations [DVD]. Available from http://www.megashare.info/watch-great-expectations-online-TmpJNE9BPT0
No comments:
Post a Comment